Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
143.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
19.19k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
17.47k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
5.97k (x1.68)
TOTAL
44.87k
46.67k (x1.04)
Multithread
2200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
64.43k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
61.91k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
13.36k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.52k (x1.1)
TOTAL
157.54k
143.23k (x0.91)
Performance/W
2200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4