Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i5-7500
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
191.71k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
25.59k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
22.57k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.27k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
8.08k (x2.28)
TOTAL
44.87k
61.51k (x1.37)
Multithread
2200G
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
88.3k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
78.59k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
19.72k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
5.1k (x1.6)
TOTAL
157.54k
191.71k (x1.22)
Performance/W
2200G
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
2949 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4