Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
22.96k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
20.8k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
7.5k (x2.11)
TOTAL
44.87k
56.03k (x1.25)
Multithread
2200G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
66.43k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
62.38k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
14.52k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
4.45k (x1.39)
TOTAL
157.54k
147.78k (x0.94)
Performance/W
2200G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4