| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i3-7100


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
906e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
126.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
25.77k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
23.26k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.43k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.09k (x1.15)
TOTAL
44.87k
58.55k (x1.31)

Multithread

2200G

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
54.98k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
54.73k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
13.12k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.65k (x1.14)
TOTAL
157.54k
126.47k (x0.8)

Performance/W
2200G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
2480 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4