Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
106.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
24.6k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
22.32k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.02k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.7k (x1.32)
TOTAL
44.87k
56.64k (x1.26)
Multithread
2200G
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
47.98k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
44.28k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
10.33k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.98k (x1.24)
TOTAL
157.54k
106.58k (x0.68)
Performance/W
2200G
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4