| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.1 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
175.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
13.72k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
22.93k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
5.27k (x1.48)
TOTAL
44.87k
46.91k (x1.05)

Multithread

2200G

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
50.54k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
93.33k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
25.25k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
6.07k (x1.9)
TOTAL
157.54k
175.18k (x1.11)

Performance/W
2200G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4