Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f82
Core
Raven Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
291.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
13.76k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
23.03k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.12k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
15.23k (x4.29)
TOTAL
44.87k
57.13k (x1.27)
Multithread
2200G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
83.23k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
161.06k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
40.52k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
6.73k (x2.1)
TOTAL
157.54k
291.53k (x1.85)
Performance/W
2200G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
4485 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4