Ryzen 3 2200G vs 3200U
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
11.13k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
19.38k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.47k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.87k (x1.09)
TOTAL
44.87k
38.85k (x0.87)
Multithread
2200G
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
17.13k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
30.56k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
9.44k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
4.09k (x1.28)
TOTAL
157.54k
61.23k (x0.39)
Performance/W
2200G
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4