| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
90675
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
33.85k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
20.33k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.51k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
11.77k (x3.32)
TOTAL
44.87k
76.46k (x1.7)

Multithread

2200G

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
174.21k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
141.31k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
64.86k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
19.01k (x5.95)
TOTAL
157.54k
399.39k (x2.54)

Performance/W
2200G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4