Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i7-1195G7
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c2
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
30.89k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
25.57k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.64k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
15.66k (x4.42)
TOTAL
44.87k
82.77k (x1.84)
Multithread
2200G
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
96.34k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
95.75k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
32.29k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
15.2k (x4.75)
TOTAL
157.54k
239.58k (x1.52)
Performance/W
2200G
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4