Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
50654
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
18.78k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
16.25k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
3.99k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
6.8k (x2.47)
TOTAL
37.55k
45.82k (x1.22)
Multithread
1200
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
133.55k (x3.46)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
108.43k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
30.02k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
9.48k (x2.84)
TOTAL
117.81k
281.48k (x2.39)
Performance/W
1200
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4