Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806e9
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
10.02k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
9.22k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
2.04k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
4.31k (x1.57)
TOTAL
37.55k
25.6k (x0.68)
Multithread
1200
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
21.75k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
20.51k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
4.97k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
5.56k (x1.67)
TOTAL
117.81k
52.78k (x0.45)
Performance/W
1200
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4