Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i7-7560U
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806e9
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
97.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
19.37k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
17.26k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
3.78k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
7.75k (x2.81)
TOTAL
37.55k
48.16k (x1.28)
Multithread
1200
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
39.17k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
38.24k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
8.9k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
10.97k (x3.29)
TOTAL
117.81k
97.27k (x0.83)
Performance/W
1200
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
6485 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4