| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 2.1 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
251.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
23.13k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
20.7k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.71k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
10.73k (x3.9)
TOTAL
37.55k
59.27k (x1.58)

Multithread

1200

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
125.17k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
98.07k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
25.57k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.01k (x0.9)
TOTAL
117.81k
251.82k (x2.14)

Performance/W
1200
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
3576 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
2802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
731 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
7195 points/W

Performance/GHz
1200
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
6608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
16934 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4