Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
23.11k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
20.58k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.73k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
7.43k (x2.7)
TOTAL
37.55k
55.86k (x1.49)
Multithread
1200
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
65.84k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
60.77k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
14.45k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
4.44k (x1.33)
TOTAL
117.81k
145.51k (x1.24)
Performance/W
1200
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4