Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
506e3
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
22.89k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
21.04k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.9k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
4.01k (x1.46)
TOTAL
37.55k
52.84k (x1.41)
Multithread
1200
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
50.05k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
47.13k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
11.38k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.72k (x1.11)
TOTAL
117.81k
112.28k (x0.95)
Performance/W
1200
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4