Ryzen 3 1200 vs A6 9220e
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
670f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
July 2017
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
29.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
7.84k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
10.54k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
2.27k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
1.7k (x0.62)
TOTAL
37.55k
22.34k (x0.59)
Multithread
1200
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
11.42k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
12.58k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
3.62k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
1.77k (x0.53)
TOTAL
117.81k
29.39k (x0.25)
Performance/W
1200
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
4898 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4