Ryzen 3 1200 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
Both models 1200 and 3020e are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
820f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
9.28k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
14.56k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
3.44k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
2.06k (x0.75)
TOTAL
37.55k
29.34k (x0.78)
Multithread
1200
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
15.75k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
28.63k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
5.87k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
2.17k (x0.65)
TOTAL
117.81k
52.42k (x0.44)
Performance/W
1200
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4