Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c1
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
24.25k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
21.63k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
9.09k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
7.23k (x2.63)
TOTAL
37.55k
62.19k (x1.66)
Multithread
1200
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
56.9k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
55.68k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
19.29k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
6.09k (x1.83)
TOTAL
117.81k
137.96k (x1.17)
Performance/W
1200
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4