| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium E5200 (R0)


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the E5200 (R0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
1067a
Core
Thuban
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
24.89k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
2.3k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
5.9k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
2.47k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.21k (x0.35)
TOTAL
12.64k
11.89k (x0.94)

Multithread

1035T

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
4.63k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
10.62k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
4.95k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.82k (x0.53)
TOTAL
58.11k
22.03k (x0.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
2.87k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
6.42k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.58k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.21k (x0.34)
TOTAL
16.77k
13.08k (x0.78)

Multithread

1035T

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
5.74k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
12.78k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
5.18k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.2k (x0.32)
TOTAL
80.19k
24.89k (x0.31)

Performance/W
1035T
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
383 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4