Phenom II X6 1035T vs Xeon X5670
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
206c2
Core
Thuban
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
6 /6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2010
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
8.35k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
5.58k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.32k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3k (x0.85)
TOTAL
16.77k
20.26k (x1.21)
Multithread
1035T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
49.72k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
35.19k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
21.88k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
8.6k (x2.33)
TOTAL
80.19k
115.4k (x1.44)
Performance/W
1035T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4