Phenom II X6 1035T vs Xeon E5502
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.6 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.6 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
106a5
Core
Thuban
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
2 /2
TDP
95 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.76k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
3.15k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
1.94k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.45k (x0.41)
TOTAL
16.77k
11.3k (x0.67)
Multithread
1035T
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
9.48k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
6.3k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
3.86k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.64k (x0.72)
TOTAL
80.19k
22.28k (x0.28)
Performance/W
1035T
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4