| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.8 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
50657
Core
Thuban
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/8
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2010
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
1.97k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
8.15k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
2.37k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.84k (x1.38)
TOTAL
12.64k
17.32k (x1.37)

Multithread

1035T

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
15.73k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
64.78k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
18.06k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
5.21k (x1.51)
TOTAL
58.11k
103.77k (x1.79)

Performance/W
1035T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
1221 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4