| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium P6200


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.5 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
20655
Core
Thuban
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
22.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.29k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
3.55k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.1k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.8k (x0.51)
TOTAL
16.77k
12.74k (x0.76)

Multithread

1035T

P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
10.06k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
6.74k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
3.96k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.16k (x0.59)
TOTAL
80.19k
22.91k (x0.29)

Performance/W
1035T
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
655 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4