| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium N3540


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.1 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
30678
Core
Thuban
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
May 2010
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
37.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
1.37k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
2k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
1.95k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.21k (x0.34)
TOTAL
12.64k
6.53k (x0.52)

Multithread

1035T

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
5.24k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
7.69k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
7.31k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.52k (x0.44)
TOTAL
58.11k
21.76k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.97k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
2.58k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
1.98k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.2k (x0.34)
TOTAL
16.77k
10.72k (x0.64)

Multithread

1035T

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
18.92k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
9.67k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
7.37k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.54k (x0.42)
TOTAL
80.19k
37.5k (x0.47)

Performance/W
1035T
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
5357 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4