| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium G4560


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
906e9
Core
Thuban
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
13.01k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
18.74k (x3.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
5.06k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
7.4k (x2.11)
TOTAL
16.77k
44.21k (x2.64)

Multithread

1035T

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
27.22k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
43.79k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
11.74k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
7.16k (x1.94)
TOTAL
80.19k
89.91k (x1.12)

Performance/W
1035T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4