Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium G3260
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306c3
Core
Thuban
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
11.73k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
10.45k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
4.55k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.83k (x1.09)
TOTAL
16.77k
30.56k (x1.82)
Multithread
1035T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
22.99k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
20.53k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
8.82k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.55k (x1.78)
TOTAL
80.19k
58.89k (x0.73)
Performance/W
1035T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4