Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core 2 Duo T6500
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the T6500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 8.7 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 8.7 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
1067a
Core
Thuban
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
10.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
9.17k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
0.07k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
3.11k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
0.62k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.02k (x0.29)
TOTAL
12.64k
4.82k (x0.38)
Multithread
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
1.2k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
3.18k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
1.53k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.21k (x0.35)
TOTAL
58.11k
7.12k (x0.12)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
2.41k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
5.31k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.04k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.14k (x0.32)
TOTAL
16.77k
10.9k (x0.65)
Multithread
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
1.81k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
4.55k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
1.58k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.23k (x0.33)
TOTAL
80.19k
9.17k (x0.11)
Performance/W
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
52 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
45 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
262 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
972 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
542 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4