Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core 2 Duo P8400
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the P8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.8 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.8 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
10676
Core
Thuban
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.267 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.267 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
Socket P
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
11.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
21.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
1.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
4.95k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
2.08k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.44k (x0.41)
TOTAL
12.64k
10.24k (x0.81)
Multithread
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
3.53k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
9.75k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
4.07k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.44k (x0.42)
TOTAL
58.11k
18.79k (x0.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
2.43k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
5.4k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.13k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.43k (x0.41)
TOTAL
16.77k
11.38k (x0.68)
Multithread
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
4.81k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
10.58k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
4.18k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.45k (x0.39)
TOTAL
80.19k
21.02k (x0.26)
Performance/W
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
423 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
841 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
629 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5022 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4