Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
10676
Core
Thuban
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
3k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
6.62k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.55k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.6k (x1.02)
TOTAL
16.77k
15.77k (x0.94)
Multithread
1035T
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
5.83k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
12.64k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
4.97k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.95k (x0.53)
TOTAL
80.19k
25.39k (x0.32)
Performance/W
1035T
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4