Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i7-950
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
106a5
Core
Thuban
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2010
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
8.01k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
5.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.11k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.96k (x0.84)
TOTAL
16.77k
19.46k (x1.16)
Multithread
1035T
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
31.53k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
24.16k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
15.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
4.75k (x1.29)
TOTAL
80.19k
76.29k (x0.95)
Performance/W
1035T
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4