Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i7-4720HQ
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 71.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 71.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306c3
Core
Thuban
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
132.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.79k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
9.64k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.34k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.76k (x1.07)
TOTAL
12.64k
21.53k (x1.7)
Multithread
1035T
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
11.66k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
37.71k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
16.38k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
5.94k (x1.72)
TOTAL
58.11k
71.69k (x1.23)
Performance/W
1035T
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
1525 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
2677 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
5980 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4