Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-9300H
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-9300H gets 80.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-9300H gets 80.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
906ea
Core
Thuban
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2010
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
244.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.38k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
12.84k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.6k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.23k (x1.77)
TOTAL
12.64k
27.05k (x2.14)
Multithread
1035T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
11.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
48.01k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
17.05k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.88k (x1.12)
TOTAL
58.11k
80.54k (x1.39)
Performance/W
1035T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
1067 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
379 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
1790 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1519 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
6597 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4