| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 130.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.6 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
906e9
Core
Thuban
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.41k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
14.14k (x3.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.41k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
8.87k (x2.52)
TOTAL
12.64k
30.83k (x2.44)

Multithread

1035T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
12.75k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
52.88k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
16.25k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
8.98k (x2.6)
TOTAL
58.11k
90.85k (x1.56)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
11.71k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
16.74k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
4.27k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
7.81k (x2.22)
TOTAL
16.77k
40.53k (x2.42)

Multithread

1035T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
44.38k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
62.55k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
15.6k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
7.85k (x2.13)
TOTAL
80.19k
130.38k (x1.63)

Performance/W
1035T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
986 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
1390 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
347 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
2897 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
4783 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
2231 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
11581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4