| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-6500


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-6500 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-6500 gets 85 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6500 is 1.5 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
506e3
Core
Thuban
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2010
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
53.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
179.44k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.46k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
14.61k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.66k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.99k (x1.99)
TOTAL
12.64k
29.71k (x2.35)

Multithread

1035T

i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
12.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
51.13k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
17.41k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.9k (x1.13)
TOTAL
58.11k
84.96k (x1.46)

Performance/W
1035T
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
787 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
1307 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
4057 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1294 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1942 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
8253 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4