| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.8 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306a9
Core
Thuban
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/6
2 /2
TDP
95 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
48.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
2.55k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
7.24k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
3.26k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.37k (x0.96)
TOTAL
12.64k
16.42k (x1.3)

Multithread

1035T

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
5.03k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
14.79k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
7.37k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
4.53k (x1.31)
TOTAL
58.11k
31.72k (x0.55)

Performance/W
1035T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
1866 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4