| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-3210M


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306a9
Core
Thuban
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
6/6
2 /2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
51.73k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.08k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
8.58k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
3.76k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.99k (x1.14)
TOTAL
12.64k
19.42k (x1.54)

Multithread

1035T

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
5.79k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
18.77k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
8.74k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
4.59k (x1.33)
TOTAL
58.11k
37.89k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
8.59k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
8.88k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.59k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.45k (x0.98)
TOTAL
16.77k
24.51k (x1.46)

Multithread

1035T

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
20.18k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
19.96k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
8.93k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
4.6k (x1.24)
TOTAL
80.19k
53.67k (x0.67)

Performance/W
1035T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1533 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4