Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-2300
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-2300 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-2300 gets 52.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-2300 gets 52.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
206a7
Core
Thuban
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2010
May 2011
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
24.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
79.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
2.52k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
7.01k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
3.77k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.22k (x1.2)
TOTAL
12.64k
17.53k (x1.39)
Multithread
1035T
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
9.46k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
26.25k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
14.1k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.13k (x0.91)
TOTAL
58.11k
52.93k (x0.91)
Performance/W
1035T
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
100 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
148 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
557 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
813 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1361 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
5654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4