Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i3-4160
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306c3
Core
Thuban
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
4.13k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
10.33k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.64k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.95k (x1.12)
TOTAL
12.64k
23.06k (x1.82)
Multithread
1035T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
7.46k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
26.62k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
11.46k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
6.27k (x1.81)
TOTAL
58.11k
51.81k (x0.89)
Performance/W
1035T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
959 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
2869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1098 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
6405 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4