Phenom II X6 1035T vs Celeron N4120
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
706a8
Core
Thuban
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.94k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
7.51k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.78k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.67k (x0.76)
TOTAL
16.77k
18.9k (x1.13)
Multithread
1035T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
15.02k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
19.77k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
7.71k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.67k (x0.99)
TOTAL
80.19k
46.17k (x0.58)
Performance/W
1035T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4