Phenom II X6 1035T vs Celeron N3450
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
506c9
Core
Thuban
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
May 2010
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
39.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
1.54k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
2.86k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
1.88k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.78k (x0.51)
TOTAL
12.64k
8.06k (x0.64)
Multithread
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
5.91k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
8.55k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
5.48k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.98k (x0.86)
TOTAL
58.11k
22.92k (x0.39)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.95k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
3.45k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
1.92k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.78k (x0.51)
TOTAL
16.77k
13.11k (x0.78)
Multithread
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
21.38k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
9.84k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
5.25k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.86k (x0.78)
TOTAL
80.19k
39.33k (x0.49)
Performance/W
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4