| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.9 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
810f81
Core
Thuban
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.24k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
13.16k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.41k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.32k (x0.94)
TOTAL
12.64k
24.12k (x1.91)

Multithread

1035T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
12.95k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
57.84k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
21.05k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.51k (x1.01)
TOTAL
58.11k
95.36k (x1.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
11.98k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
15.85k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
4.53k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.29k (x0.94)
TOTAL
16.77k
35.65k (x2.13)

Multithread

1035T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
48.28k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
74.19k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
23.29k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.47k (x0.94)
TOTAL
80.19k
149.23k (x1.86)

Performance/W
1035T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4