| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
810f10
Core
Thuban
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
2.63k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
7.84k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
3.63k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.93k (x0.83)
TOTAL
12.64k
17.02k (x1.35)

Multithread

1035T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
5.77k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
24.15k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
9.28k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.83k (x0.82)
TOTAL
58.11k
42.02k (x0.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
11.67k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
14.02k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
4.53k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.93k (x0.83)
TOTAL
16.77k
33.14k (x1.98)

Multithread

1035T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
20.49k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
31.32k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
9.99k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.03k (x0.82)
TOTAL
80.19k
64.82k (x0.81)

Performance/W
1035T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4