Phenom II X6 1035T vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
Both models 1035T and 260 are based on K10 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.9 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.9 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
100f63
Core
Thuban
Regor
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
May 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
6.04k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
6.2k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.11k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.7k (x0.48)
TOTAL
16.77k
17.05k (x1.02)
Multithread
1035T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
10.02k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
10.18k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
5.1k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.25k (x0.61)
TOTAL
80.19k
27.54k (x0.34)
Performance/W
1035T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4