FX 9590 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.6 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.6 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306e4
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/8
12 /24
TDP
220 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
633.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
10.53k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
4k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.4k (x0.48)
TOTAL
32.41k
27.92k (x0.86)
Multithread
9590
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
247.05k (x4.48)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
264.43k (x5.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
111.01k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
10.66k (x2.8)
TOTAL
137.65k
633.14k (x4.6)
Performance/W
9590
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4