FX 9590 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306f2
Core
Vishera
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/8
12/24
TDP
220 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
452.9k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.18k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
10.06k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.21k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.12k (x0.44)
TOTAL
32.41k
27.57k (x0.85)
Multithread
9590
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
140.98k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
145.37k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
45.62k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
6.75k (x1.77)
TOTAL
137.65k
338.73k (x2.46)
Performance/W
9590
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
2823 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
3245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1007 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
8894 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4