FX 9590 vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
a0652
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
220 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
349.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
16.71k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
25.45k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
6.06k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
13.2k (x1.85)
TOTAL
32.41k
61.43k (x1.9)
Multithread
9590
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
67.59k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
111.94k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
27.7k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
5.3k (x1.39)
TOTAL
137.65k
212.53k (x1.54)
Performance/W
9590
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
2487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
4723 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3342 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5091 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
12285 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4