FX 9590 vs Core i3-7100
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-7100 gets 100.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-7100 gets 100.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
906e9
Core
Vishera
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
220 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
126.47k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
14.41k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
22.38k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
5.45k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
4.96k (x0.69)
TOTAL
32.41k
47.21k (x1.46)
Multithread
9590
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
30.48k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
52.08k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
12.97k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
4.56k (x1.2)
TOTAL
137.65k
100.1k (x0.73)
Performance/W
9590
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
598 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
1963 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1273 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
12105 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4