FX 9590 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
406e3
Core
Vishera
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
220 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
69.94k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
8.06k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
12.85k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.14k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
4.01k (x0.56)
TOTAL
32.41k
28.06k (x0.87)
Multithread
9590
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
16.58k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
28.88k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
7.38k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.82k (x1)
TOTAL
137.65k
56.66k (x0.41)
Performance/W
9590
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1925 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
492 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
254 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
3777 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1742 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
12201 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4