FX 9590 vs Core i3-3220
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-3220 gets 55.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-3220 gets 55.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306a9
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
220 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
25.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
55.82k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
8.29k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.1k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.93k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.74k (x0.52)
TOTAL
32.41k
25.06k (x0.77)
Multithread
9590
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
19.26k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
24.65k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
8.75k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.15k (x0.83)
TOTAL
137.65k
55.82k (x0.41)
Performance/W
9590
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
448 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
1015 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
2756 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
7593 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4